Financial development, technological innovation and energy security: Evidence from Chinese provincial experience
Energy Economics, ISSN: 0140-9883, Vol: 112, Page: 106161
2022
- 109Citations
- 86Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Rapid growth in the demand for global energy has raised concerns about energy security and climate change. Based on statistical data of 30 provinces in China from 2000 to 2018, this paper takes energy security as the focus, adopting a fixed effect model, random effect model, instrumental variable estimation, and panel threshold model to systematically verify the influence of the relationship between financial development, technological innovation, and their interaction term on energy security. Through a series of empirical analyses, endogeneity tests, and robustness tests, the findings suggest that China's energy security is enhanced by financial development and technological innovation. Specifically, financial development can improve energy security through technological innovation. At the same time, there is a nonlinear threshold effect between financial development and energy security due to differences in technological innovation between regions. Further heterogeneity analysis shows that the constraint of technological innovation is significantly supported in coastal regions and regions with low capital stock. The empirical results of this paper provide policy recommendations and empirical insights for China's energy security.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988322003152; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106161; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85133622415&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140988322003152; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106161
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know