Nudging energy efficiency behavior: The effect of message framing on implicit discount rate
Energy Economics, ISSN: 0140-9883, Vol: 117, Page: 106485
2023
- 8Citations
- 31Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We experimentally and empirically analyzed how gain-framing and loss-framing information regarding the economic benefits of purchasing a high-efficiency appliance affects consumers' implicit discount rate (IDR). For the empirical analysis, we focused on the South Korean air purifier market, and we used the contingent valuation method to estimate the IDR. The results suggest differences in consumer groups that respond more sensitively to message framing. In the loss frame, the respondents' cognition level showed an influence on the IDR. The median IDR was 10.15% and 6.59% in the gain and loss frames, respectively. These figures were higher than the general market discount rate, regardless of how the given information was framed, thus confirming an energy efficiency gap. We deduced that there are more consumers with a very low IDR in the loss frame than in the gain frame. Hence, it will be possible to reduce the energy efficiency investment gap and encourage consumers to voluntarily invest in energy efficiency through message framing nudging via consumption efficiency appliance labels.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988322006144; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106485; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85144626734&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140988322006144; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106485
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know