Effect of flame interaction on swirl-stabilized mesoscale burner array performance
Energy, ISSN: 0360-5442, Vol: 192, Page: 116661
2020
- 21Citations
- 27Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Individual flames in a swirl-stabilized mesoscale burner array can interact with neighboring flames for optimum burner array operation, particularly at lean equivalence ratios. Understanding these interactions are therefore critical for optimizing the mesoscale burner array. This study probes the effect of burner performance and stability based on experimental data of two burner array configurations (dense and sparse) under steady and acoustic perturbation conditions. First, the dense lean blow off equivalence ratios and flame temperatures were examined. The dense burner array lean blow off limits were 8.8 % lower than the sparse burner array. Maximum flame temperature of the dense burner array was 56.4 K higher compared to its sparse counterpart at the equivalence ratio of 0.65. Second, various flame structures from both mesoscale burner arrays were visualized using OH planar laser induced fluorescence imaging. Results showed that flame structures from the dense mesoscale burner array produced a wider range of stable power outputs. Lastly, proper orthogonal decomposition, phase-averaging, and Rayleigh index-based stability analyses were performed using 10 kHz OH* chemiluminescence imaging. Results showed that the dense mesoscale burner array exhibited better thermal-acoustic damping with smaller heat release fluctuations under acoustic perturbation range from 80 to 270 Hz compared to the sparse mesoscale burner array.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219323564; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116661; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85076005116&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360544219323564; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116661
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know