Effects of the geometrical features of flow paths on the flow behaviour of a multi-stage labyrinth pressure reducing valve throttling components
Energy, ISSN: 0360-5442, Vol: 296, Page: 130962
2024
- 3Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
It is important to note that an inappropriate design of the valve can generate noise and vibration, causing harmful effects on both personnel and equipment.However, the impact of geometric parameters of throttling elements on the internal flow mechanism of pressure reducing valves and their effect on pressure drop and Mach number is not yet clear. To address this gap, we employ both experimental and numerical methods to investigate the flow mechanism and its impact on pressure drop and Mach number for various geometrical parameters. With these insights, we conduct a sensitivity analysis and adopt the L 9 (3 4 ) orthogonal design method to optimize the design of the throttling components. The results demonstrate that steam flow within the MSLPRV operates in a supersonic regime. However, excessively high expansion coefficients (γ) can lead to structural changes that are too drastic, posing challenges for achieving stable pressure reduction and controlling the outlet Mach number within the flow channel. Moreover, we observe that the channel shape and outer wall radius ( R/DH ) exhibit a weak functional relationship with the pressure drop and Mach number. To ensure a reasonable pressure distribution within the labyrinth flow channels, it is crucial to adopt a smaller internal wall radius ( r/DH ) and appropriate channel depth( λ/DH ). Furthermore, under the same boundary conditions, increasing the number of stages (N) in the throttling components proves advantageous for achieving staged pressure reduction, thereby resulting in lower outlet Mach numbers and reduced kinetic energy within the flow channel. Finally, optimized design of labyrinth flow channels is achieved with expansion coefficients γ = 1.05, stage numbers N = 10, channel depths λ/DH=1.2, and internal wall radius r/DH=0.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224007345; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.130962; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85189442116&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360544224007345; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.130962
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know