Decoding the mechanisms influencing public acceptance of carbon dioxide capture and storage technology in China
Energy, ISSN: 0360-5442, Vol: 313, Page: 133888
2024
- 1Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (CCS) technology plays a crucial role in reducing carbon emissions and addressing climate change, making it essential to understand the key factors influencing public acceptance of CCS technology. This study comprehensively analyzes the impact of different information dissemination methods on the acceptance of CCS technology among the Chinese public. The study conducted an in-depth analysis of data from 1313 respondents using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and employed the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to validate the evaluations from 13 experts. The results indicate that the Not In My Backyard (NIMBY) effect is the most critical factor influencing public acceptance of CCS technology, followed by Recognition of Utility (ROU).Success case information significantly enhances public acceptance of CCS technology, while risk information, although increasing awareness, also heightens concerns. This study provided valuable insights for developing strategies to improve public acceptance of CCS technology.
Bibliographic Details
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know