Lanolina y educación para la salud en la prevención de dolor y lesiones en los pezones: ensayo clínico aleatorizado
Enfermería Clínica, ISSN: 1130-8621, Vol: 31, Issue: 2, Page: 82-90
2021
- 6Citations
- 95Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations6
- Citation Indexes6
- Captures95
- Readers95
- 76
- 19
Article Description
Investigar el efecto de la lanolina sobre el dolor y el traumatismo de los pezones en la lactancia después de la aplicación de educación para la salud. Ensayo clínico controlado aleatorizado, con 2 brazos, sin cegamiento, con 66 participantes durante la atención prenatal en la red básica de salud en Goiânia-Goiás, Brasil. Las participantes fueron aleatorizadas (1:1) utilizando números generados por ordenador en el grupo experimental (GE) y en el grupo de control (GC). El GE recibió lanolina y educación para la salud sobre lactancia materna en 2 momentos diferentes, con demostración clínica y álbum ilustrativo como intervención, mientras que el GC recibió educación para la salud estándar. La educación para la salud fue realizada por los mismos investigadores en ambos grupos. El dolor, la lesión del pezón y la lactancia se midieron en el octavo día posparto. El análisis incluyó estadística descriptiva y análisis inferencial mediante la prueba de Chi-cuadrado o Fisher y la prueba de la t de Student, con un nivel de significación de 0,05. La mayoría de las participantes no experimentaron lesiones en el pezón (59,1%) en ambos grupos, y el 60,6% de las mujeres experimentaron dolor. En ambos grupos, las mujeres mostraron comportamientos favorables a la lactancia materna, excepto en la condición de los senos. No hubo diferencias significativas entre los grupos en la prevención del dolor (p = 0,61), lesiones de los pezones (p = 0,21) y la técnica de lactancia (p > 0,05). No está claro si la intervención de lanolina combinada con educación para la salud tiene un efecto positivo en la prevención del dolor y el traumatismo en los pezones. Se necesitan más investigaciones para dilucidar esta cuestión. To investigate the effect of lanolin on nipple pain and trauma in breastfeeding after application of a health education. Randomized controlled clinical trial, with two arms, open, with 66 participants during prenatal care in the primary health care network in Goiania – Goias, Brazil. Participants were randomized (1:1) using computer generated numbers in both experimental group (EG) and control group (CG). The EG received lanolin and health education on breastfeeding at two different times with clinical demonstration using cloth didactic breast and illustrative album as the intervention, while the CG received standard health education. Health education was carried out by the same researchers in both groups. Measurement of pain, nipple trauma, and breastfeeding technique occurred on postpartum day eight. The analysis included descriptive statistics and inferential analysis by means chi-square or Fisher test, and Student's t -test, significance level set at 0.05. A majority of the participants experienced no nipple trauma (59.1%) in both groups, and 60.6% of women experienced pain. In both groups, women showed favorable breastfeeding behaviors, except in the condition of the breasts. There were no significant differences between groups in pain prevention ( p = 0.61), nipple lesions ( p = 0.21), and breastfeeding technique ( p > 0.05). It is not clear whether the intervention, lanolin combined with health education, has a positive effect on the prevention of nipple pain and trauma. Further research is needed to elucidate this question. Registration number: RBR-7tvhq8. Registry website: http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130862120305313; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2020.10.030; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85097127497&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33277168; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1130862120305313; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2020.10.030
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know