A Review on the 3D Printing of Functional Structures for Medical Phantoms and Regenerated Tissue and Organ Applications
Engineering, ISSN: 2095-8099, Vol: 3, Issue: 5, Page: 653-662
2017
- 116Citations
- 373Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Medical models, or “phantoms,” have been widely used for medical training and for doctor-patient interactions. They are increasingly used for surgical planning, medical computational models, algorithm verification and validation, and medical devices development. Such new applications demand high-fidelity, patient-specific, tissue-mimicking medical phantoms that can not only closely emulate the geometric structures of human organs, but also possess the properties and functions of the organ structure. With the rapid advancement of three-dimensional (3D) printing and 3D bioprinting technologies, many researchers have explored the use of these additive manufacturing techniques to fabricate functional medical phantoms for various applications. This paper reviews the applications of these 3D printing and 3D bioprinting technologies for the fabrication of functional medical phantoms and bio-structures. This review specifically discusses the state of the art along with new developments and trends in 3D printed functional medical phantoms (i.e., tissue-mimicking medical phantoms, radiologically relevant medical phantoms, and physiological medical phantoms) and 3D bio-printed structures (i.e., hybrid scaffolding materials, convertible scaffolds, and integrated sensors) for regenerated tissues and organs.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095809917307178; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2017.05.013; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85040728506&origin=inward; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2095809917307178; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S2095809917307178?httpAccept=text/xml; http://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S2095809917307178?httpAccept=text/plain; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2095809917307178; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2017.05.013
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know