Three different methods for numerical solution of the EW equation
Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, ISSN: 0955-7997, Vol: 32, Issue: 7, Page: 556-566
2008
- 35Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Numerical solutions of the equal width wave (EW) equation are obtained by using a Galerkin method with quartic B-spline finite elements, a differential quadrature method with cosine expansion basis and a meshless method with radial-basis functions. Solitary wave motion, interaction of two solitary waves and wave undulation are studied to validate the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed methods. Comparisons are made with analytical solutions and those of some earlier papers. The accuracy and efficiency are discussed by computing the numerical conserved laws and L2, L∞ error norms.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955799707001828; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2007.11.002; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=44449103821&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0955799707001828; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0955799707001828?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S0955799707001828?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2007.11.002
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know