Indirect boundary element method solution to the seismic ground motion of near-fault sedimentary valley
Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, ISSN: 0955-7997, Vol: 132, Page: 289-308
2021
- 6Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In this paper, the indirect boundary element method (IBEM) is developed to solve the ground motion effect of the near-fault complex site. By establishing a two-dimensional kinematic finite fault model, the amplification effect of seismic response of sedimentary valley under the continuous dislocation of reverse faults is quantitatively analyzed. Meanwhile, the influence of the parameters such as the buried depth of the fault top, the fault dip-angle, the fault distance of sedimentary valley, the fault-plane shape, and the rupture velocity of fault on the seismic response are studied. The results show that the sedimentary valley has a pronounced amplification effect on the seismic response induced by near-fault, and the peak value of the acceleration response spectrum of the analyzed model can be amplified by 99.3%. In the sedimentary valley, the duration of earthquake motion is significantly prolonged, and the long-period velocity pulse appears, and the first velocity pulse can be amplified by 68.7%. The near-fault ground motion damages have typical concentration-effect and hanging wall effect. This study provides a new and effective method, which is of great significance for seismic zoning of complex sites near-fault. It will be of guiding significance for regional planning and seismic fortification of near-fault sites.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955799721002071; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2021.07.016; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85112433828&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0955799721002071; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2021.07.016
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know