The machine learning in lithium-ion batteries: A review
Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, ISSN: 0955-7997, Vol: 141, Page: 1-16
2022
- 25Citations
- 56Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Among energy storage devices (ESDs), lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have widespread utilization in cleaner productions. Hence, accurate estimation of the state of LIBs has attracted the attention of many researchers. On the other hand, the design of LIBs requires a compromise between large groups of effective factors. Machine learning (ML) utilized in chemistry, physics, biology, engineering, and materials science can improve the estimation accuracy of LIBs by reducing the calculation burden. This review paper begins with the introduction of ESDs and ML. Then, five popular ML terminologies are reviewed. Numerical and analytical evaluation of PCM-based heatsinks employed in LIBs is presented to introduce how effective data can be collected. LIBs and several studies in the field of batteries are discussed and finally, ML for LIBs is described by reviewing some relevant articles. Conclusions and future directions are also provided.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955799722001436; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2022.04.035; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85130375971&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0955799722001436; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2022.04.035
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know