An improved flocking control algorithm to solve the effect of individual communication barriers on flocking cohesion in multi-agent systems
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, ISSN: 0952-1976, Vol: 137, Page: 109110
2024
- 1Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Flocking cohesion is a crucial factor for groups to maintain aggregation. Communication barriers can significantly challenge the maintenance of flocking aggregation and integrity. Although several studies have focused on communication barriers between agents and the Leader, less attention has been given to agents' self-communication barriers. This paper investigates the effect of two kinds of communication barriers that coexist on flocking cohesion. One is the communication barrier between agents and the Leader. There are informed and uninformed agents, with informed agents receiving different degrees of complete information about the Leader. The other is the agent's self-communication barrier, where each agent has a failure rate that prevents it from obtaining and transmitting information. Then, a novel potential function is designed by analyzing the correlation between the potential function and flocking cohesion. It enhances flocking cohesion and reduces flocking time. Moreover, the flocking control algorithm is improved by incorporating a local feedback mechanism. It allows informed agents to transfer information more broadly and promotes interaction among agents, further enhancing flocking cohesion and integrity. Stability analysis is performed using the Lyapunov theorem. Finally, we propose three criteria for evaluating flocking performance. Based on these criteria, simulation results demonstrate the proposed potential function and control algorithm's significant advantages. This control algorithm is applicable for addressing individual communication issues in swarming drones or flocking robots during missions in engineering applications.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197624012685; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109110; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85200897259&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0952197624012685; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109110
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know