Explained fire resistance machine learning models for compressed steel members of trusses and bracing systems
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, ISSN: 0952-1976, Vol: 139, Page: 109571
2025
- 2Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Trusses and bracing systems are usually constructed from monosymmetric and built-up cross-sections, which under compression stresses may buckle in torsional or flexural–torsional modes. In fire, this phenomenon is utterly important as failure in bracing systems or trusses may cause the collapse of buildings and result in loss of lives or severe economic impacts. Machine learning models, including neural networks, random forests and support vector machines, are developed considering a dataset with 21879 samples and are further assessed in this study as an alternative with greater accuracy and ease of application over existing design methods, namely the Eurocode 3 Part 1-2 and a recent proposal for its improvement. The machine learning models are explained using a combination of domain knowledge inference, partial dependence plots and SHapley Additive exPlanations. The accuracy versus safety trade-off is discussed for a better-informed model selection. The proposed approach and discussion create an additional confidence layer for applying these techniques for the fire design.
Bibliographic Details
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know