Extractable and kerogen-bound hopanoids from typical Eocene oil shales in China
Energy Geoscience, ISSN: 2666-7592, Vol: 5, Issue: 2, Page: 100264
2024
- 5Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures5
- Readers5
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Findings from Sinopec Group in Energy Geoscience Reported (Extractable and kerogen-bound hopanoids from typical Eocene oil shales in China)
2024 MAY 03 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Energy Daily News -- New study results on energy geoscience have been published.
Article Description
This study conducted a comparative analysis of extractable hopanoid hydrocarbons and those released via stepwise pyrolysis of typical Eocene immature oil shales in China, namely the Huadian, Maoming, and Fushun shales. Both the Huadian and Maoming shales exhibit immature indicators in extractable and kerogen-bound hopanoids (notably, high abundance of C 29 to C 32 17β,21β-hopanes and unsaturated hopenes). In contrast, the Fushun oil shale's hopanoids from extracts and pyrolyzates suggest a higher maturity level. The absence of neohopenes in the pyrolyzates of the shales underpins that the kerogen-bound hopanoid skeletons resist rearrangement. However, the Huadian oil shale's asymmetric distribution of C 29 and C 30 hopenes and neohopenes hints at the presence of an additional source. Novel unsaturated hopenes, such as hop-20 (21)-enes, identified in pyrolyzates of the three kerogens at various pyrolysis temperatures, reveal the occurrence of double bonds in kerogen-bound hopanoid skeletons without methyl rearrangements. The absence of hop-20-(21)-ene in extracts suggests that it might act as an intermediate of these novel hopenes during the epimerization of hopanoid skeletons within kerogen. The extractable and pyrolytic hopanoids' stereochemical alignment indicates that epimerization may occur in both ring systems and alkyl side chains of kerogen-bound hopanoid skeletons. Sequential stepwise pyrolysis proves to be a quick screening method for geological hopanoids without causing any significant alteration to the original skeletons even when cracking multiple covalent bonds is necessary.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666759223001105; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engeos.2023.100264; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85179582813&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2666759223001105; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engeos.2023.100264
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know