Intelligent safety evaluation of tunnel lining cracks based on machine learning
Engineering Failure Analysis, ISSN: 1350-6307, Vol: 167, Page: 109082
2025
- 2Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Tunnel crack-related issues are a major factor affecting operational safety. Traditional safety assessment methods cannot avoid the influence of subjective human factors, and the adoption of intelligent machine learning algorithms is emerging as a novel and effective approach. This study utilizes statistical data on tunnel cracks from existing projects and performs refined modeling of lining cracks using ABAQUS software and the Extended Finite Element Method (XFEM). The model’s validity was confirmed based on laboratory test results. Subsequently, the safety levels of the cracks were assessed using two methods: ’crack tip stability’ and ’sectional bearing capacity’. Next, intelligent evaluation methods, including the Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), Extremely Randomized Trees (ETC), and Support Vector Machine (SVC), were introduced. Crack length, depth, volume, area, type, and location were selected as features, and through training and parameter tuning of the four algorithms, a nonlinear mapping relationship between input and output parameters was established. Finally, the developed evaluation method was applied to the Chongqing Nancheng Tunnel. The results showed that the accuracy of machine learning-based intelligent evaluation methods exceeded that of traditional evaluation methods. This approach is expected to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of tunnel lining crack maintenance.
Bibliographic Details
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know