Does printing direction influence the bond between 3D printed polymeric reinforcement and cementitious matrix?
Engineering Failure Analysis, ISSN: 1350-6307, Vol: 174, Page: 109471
2025
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The use of 3D printed polymers in the form of lattice reinforcement can enhance the mechanical properties of cementitious composites. Methods like Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) 3D printing enable their creation, but this process has a large (negative) effect on their mechanical properties, with a large dependency on the printing direction. Continuing on our previous study concerned with modelling the anisotropic behaviour of 3D printed polymeric reinforcement, this work focuses on the reinforcement-matrix bond. Because of the layer-by-layer filament extrusion process of the 3D printing technique, the edges of FDM 3D printed polymers are typically composed of ellipses. Based on this, it is hypothesized that morphological effects as a result of the 3D printing technique enhance the bond between 3D printed reinforcement and cementitious matrix: The elliptic geometry potentially facilitates interlocking with the cementitious mortar, thereby possibly enhancing the bond behaviour in certain directions. To investigate the geometrical directional-dependent features at the edges of 3D printed polymers in more detail, micro-scale models are developed. Geometrical effects induced by different printing configurations are studied. The simulation results are verified through meso-scale pull-out experiments. The interlocking effects as a result of the 3D printing technique show to be significant seeing a bond strength increase of up to 56 % in one of the print configurations compared to the direction without any geometrical effects.
Bibliographic Details
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know