Criteria for discriminating layer-penetration fracturing considering pressure drop and interfaces
Engineering Fracture Mechanics, ISSN: 0013-7944, Vol: 292, Page: 109622
2023
- 3Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Accurately predicting fracture height growth in a stratified reservoir presents a significant challenge. In this study, we have developed a semi-analytical prediction model for fracture height growth that accounts for pressure drop effects and considers the influence of bedding interfaces, all based on the principles of equilibrium height theory. The methodology involves solving intricate nonlinear equations and generating fracture height profiles, systematically investigating the effects of various factors: in-situ stress, fracture toughness, fluid density, and perforation location on fracture height. Sensitivity analysis of the model has revealed findings: (1) The presence of a stress barrier leads to a substantial increase in the induced stress required for fracture height growth. In particular, the stress barrier inhibits growth on one side while promoting it on the opposite side. (2) The influence of the fracture toughness barrier on fracture height growth, while significant, is overshadowed by that of the stress barrier. An increase in the fracture toughness of the rock decelerates the rate of fracture height growth but simultaneously raises the required induced stress for layer penetration. (3) Increasing the density of the fracturing fluid exerts a dual effect, slowing the growth rate of the upper fracture tip while accelerating the advancement of the lower fracture tip. Higher fluid density, under constant perforating pressure, results in a noticeable reduction in overall fracture height. (4) Fracture growth from the low-stress layer to the high-stress layer required an increase in induced stress. The research findings not only provide essential data on fracture height profiles, enhancing the applicability of the pseudo-3D hydraulic fracture propagation model, but also contribute to the refinement of governing equations within hydraulic fracture modeling.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013794423005805; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109622; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85170652132&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0013794423005805; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109622
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know