Seismic behavior and design of concrete-filled steel tubular frame-RC core tube structures
Engineering Structures, ISSN: 0141-0296, Vol: 321, Page: 118945
2024
- 1Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In the design of frame-core tube structures, the method for adjusting the frame bearing capacity and stiffness to ensure the structure as a dual system is a critical issue. This study investigates the effects of frame shear distribution ratio, frame bearing capacity, and column pattern on the seismic performance of concrete-filled steel tubular frame to reinforced concrete core tube structures (CFRCTs). Time-history and seismic fragility analyses on eight representative models are performed and the distribution pattern of inter-story drift ratios, structural damage modes, and collapse safety margins are compared. The study results show that CFRCTs possess superior seismic performance (with a collapse margin ratio > 9.3) compared to the structures with reinforced concrete columns and the collapse margin ratio continuously increases from 9.3 to 11.2 with increasing frame stiffness. Enhancing the frame bearing capacity mitigates the frame damage, while improving slightly on structure’s collapse resistance (< 0.1 %). Without adjusting the frame for the second fortification line, damage to the column is not serious and the frame can still effectively withstand the increased shear force transmitted from the core tube during an extremely severe earthquake. The frame experiences more shear force and damage as the frame shear distribution ratio increases; while the core tube damage is effectively alleviated. Due to the redistribution of internal forces, the distribution pattern of inter-story drift ratios under the collapse state is markedly distinct from that under the elastic stage and severe earthquakes. Based on the analysis, design suggestions considering both collapse resistance and economic efficiency are proposed for CFRCTs.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029624015074; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118945; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85203457918&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0141029624015074; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118945
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know