Sodium uptake and transport regulation, and photosynthetic efficiency maintenance as the basis of differential salt tolerance in rice cultivars
Environmental and Experimental Botany, ISSN: 0098-8472, Vol: 192, Page: 104654
2021
- 20Citations
- 24Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Rice ( Oryza sativa L.) is among the most consumed cereals in the world. Its growth is severely affected by excessive salinity, leading to considerable negative economic impacts. Thus, BRS Esmeralda and São Francisco rice cultivars, presenting antagonist cultivation recommendations and differential salt tolerance, were selected to examine how salt stress influences ionic homeostasis and photosynthetic capacity. Phenotypic, physiological, molecular, and morphological results indicated that São Francisco had a better potential to withstand salt stress than BRS Esmeralda. Although salinity promoted a significant increase in Na + content, particularly in BRS Esmeralda, the harmful effects were less severe in São Francisco. The upregulation of SOS and NHX gene expressions revealed that São Francisco used these mechanisms to control Na + accumulation in cytosol. Besides, São Francisco plants were efficient in reducing the adverse effects of salinity on photosynthesis. Under salt stress, São Francisco leaves exhibited better effective quantum efficiency of PSII, photochemical extinction coefficient, and electron transport rate. Besides, the relative energy excess in PSII and non-photochemical quenching were both smaller compared to BRS Esmeralda. Na + cytotoxic effects damaged the chloroplast ultrastructure in BRS Esmeralda, reducing photosynthetic capacity. In contrast, the São Francisco cultivar's better performance was followed by an efficient Na + exclusion and photosynthetic capacity maintenance, leading to lower growth losses. Overall, the findings are suitable for understanding salt responses and developing functional markers associated with salt stress tolerance improvement in rice.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098847221002847; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2021.104654; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85115932292&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0098847221002847; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2021.104654
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know