Targeted and non-targeted analysis for the investigation of pesticides influence on wheat cultivated under field conditions
Environmental Pollution, ISSN: 0269-7491, Vol: 316, Issue: Pt 1, Page: 120468
2023
- 7Citations
- 25Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes7
- Captures25
- Readers25
- 25
Article Description
A comprehensive approach was applied to evaluate the effects of pesticides on the metabolism of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L). The application of commercially available pesticide formulations under field cultivation conditions provided a source of metabolic data unlimited by model conditions, representing a novel approach to study the effects of pesticides on edible plants. Gas and liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry were employed for targeted and non-targeted analysis of wheat roots and shoots sampled six times during the six-week experiment. The applied pesticides: prothioconazole, tebuconazole, fluoxastrobin, diflufenican, florasulam, and penoxulam were found at concentrations ranging 0.0070–25.20 mg/kg and 0.0020–2.2 mg/kg in the wheat roots and shoots, respectively. The following pesticide metabolites were identified in shoots: prothioconazole-desthio (prothioconazole metabolite), 5-(4-chlorophenyl)-2,2-dimethyl-3-(1,2,4-triazol-1-ylmethyl)pentane-1,3-diol (tebuconazole metabolite), and N -(5,8-dimethoxy[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidin-2-yl)-2,4-dihydroxy-6-(trifluoromethyl)benzene sulphonamide (penoxulam metabolite). The metabolic fingerprints and profiles changed during the experiment, reflecting the cumulative response of wheat to both its growth environment and pesticides, as well as their metabolites. Approximately 15 days after the herbicide treatment no further changes in the plant metabolic profiles were observed, despite the presence of pesticide and their metabolites in both roots and shoots. This is the first study to combine the determination of pesticides and their metabolites plant tissues with the evaluation of plant metabolic responses under field conditions. This exhaustive approach contributes to broadening the knowledge of pesticide effects on edible plants, relevant to food safety.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749122016827; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120468; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85141521854&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36283473; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0269749122016827; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120468
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know