Gestational exposures to outdoor air pollutants in relation to low birth weight: A retrospective observational study
Environmental Research, ISSN: 0013-9351, Vol: 193, Page: 110354
2021
- 13Citations
- 53Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations13
- Citation Indexes13
- 13
- CrossRef9
- Captures53
- Readers53
- 53
Article Description
Findings for impacts of outdoor air pollutants on birth outcomes were controversial. We performed a retrospective observational study in 2527 preschoolers of Shanghai, China and investigated associations of duration-averaged concentrations of outdoor sulphur dioxide (SO 2 ), nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ), and particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter ≤ 10 μm (PM 10 ) in different months and trimesters of gestation, with preterm birth (PB), low birth weight (LBW), term low birth weight (T-LBW), and small for gestational age (SGA). Daily concentrations of outdoor air pollutants were collected in each residence-located district. Parents reported health information. In the multivariate logistic regression analyses, exposures to outdoor NO 2 were consistently associated with the higher odds of LBW and T-LBW. These associations were generally stronger for early months than for later months of the gestation. Adjusted odds ratios generally were larger in multi-pollutant model than in single-pollutant model. Exposure to NO 2 in the first month of the gestation was significantly associated with T-LBW (adjusted OR, 95%CI: 1.91, 1.02–3.58 for increment of interquartile range (18.5 μg/m 3 ); p -value = 0.044) in multi-pollutant model. This association was stronger in girls, renters, and children whose mothers ≥30 years-old, with household dampness-related exposures, and with parental smoking during pregnancy. Our results indicate that exposure to NO 2 during gestation perhaps is a risk factor for LBW and T-LBW, and effects of NO 2 exposures could be greater during early periods than during later periods of gestation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935120312512; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110354; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85094624399&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33098816; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0013935120312512; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110354
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know