A robust alternative for correcting systematic biases in multi-variable climate model simulations
Environmental Modelling & Software, ISSN: 1364-8152, Vol: 139, Page: 105019
2021
- 14Citations
- 21Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The existing bias correction (BC) methods used in impact studies are routinely based on a fixed model structure and often ignore the nature and magnitude of biases, and their variations into the future. As a calibrated model is applied to bias correct the future time series, there is no feedback mechanism to assess the impact of model complexity on the model performance in the future. In this paper we propose a flexible modelling strategy to create a robust bias correction procedure, in the form of an open-source toolkit in the R statistical computing environment. The approach allows the user to apply a multi-dimensional bias correction model that is self-evolving and grows in complexity on the basis of the requirement of the raw data. The theoretical background and the capabilities of the software along with a sample application and results discussions are demonstrated in this paper.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364815221000621; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105019; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85102788449&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1364815221000621; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105019
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know