Predicting unsafe behaviors at nuclear power plants: An integration of Theory of Planned Behavior and Technology Acceptance Model
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, ISSN: 0169-8141, Vol: 80, Page: 103047
2020
- 25Citations
- 126Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Unsafe behaviors, including both errors and violations, have been identified as key contributors to accidents at nuclear power plants. However, the mechanisms behind such unsafe behaviors are not fully understood. This study aimed to investigate how workers' attitude and perception factors would predict errors and violations at nuclear power plants by proposing and validating an unsafe behavior model. The proposed model applied the Theory of Planned Behavior as the ground theoretical model and added factors from Technology Acceptance Model to capture workers’ perception of work regulations. To examine the validity of the proposed model, a total of 178 questionnaires were distributed at two nuclear power plants in China and 171 valid questionnaires were returned. The Structured Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis indicated that the proposed model fitted the data well. The results showed that perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness in following work regulations contributed to a positive attitude, which helped reduce the occurrence of both errors and violations. Moreover, errors were further affected by subjective norm while violations were not. Perceived behavior control was not a significant factor of either errors or violations. These findings suggest that to reduce errors and violations, policymakers should focus on methods to improve the perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of work regulations, and promote a positive attitude towards safety.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016981412030367X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2020.103047; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85092533352&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S016981412030367X; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S016981412030367X?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S016981412030367X?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2020.103047
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know