A visual and neural evaluation of the affective impression on humanoid robot appearances in free viewing
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, ISSN: 0169-8141, Vol: 88, Page: 103159
2022
- 15Citations
- 21Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This study aims to characterize the fixation pattern and neutral dynamics underlying affective impressions on humanoid robot appearances, which have a moderate anthropomorphism, to provide an objective evaluation of the affective impressions. Thirty appearance pictures of existing humanoid robots leaving negative, neutral, or positive impressions were selected online. Users’ eye-tracking and electroencephalography signals for the appearances were co-registered in a free viewing paradigm, and eye-tracking metrics and eye fixation-related potentials were extracted. The results showed that the head attracted the most eye-tracking metrics, including glance count, fixation count, fixation time, and fixation duration. The torso attracted the second most, the legs and the hands attracted the third most, and the arms and feet drew the least. Humanoid robot appearances giving positive impressions caught less glance counts and shorter fixation duration than the appearances giving negative or neutral impressions on both partial and whole appearances. The appearances giving positive impressions evoked the smallest P1 amplitude, and the appearances giving neutral impressions evoked the largest P1 amplitude, compared with that giving negative impressions. The findings suggest that glance count and fixation duration could distinguish the positive impression on humanoid robot appearances, and the P1 amplitude could distinguish the three affective impressions. These findings could promote the understanding of fixation pattern on humanoid robot appearances, which could be referred to directly when designing appearances for humanoid robots. Moreover, this study could provide designers with a visual and neural method of evaluating affective impressions on humanoid robot appearances in free viewing.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814121000779; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103159; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85113876896&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0169814121000779; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103159
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know