Wonderland of technology? How energy landscapes reveal inequalities and injustices of the German Energiewende
Energy Research & Social Science, ISSN: 2214-6296, Vol: 70, Page: 101733
2020
- 27Citations
- 80Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The aim of this study is to gain a better understanding of what characterizes energy landscapes in general and to what extent they are an expression of social inequalities and injustices in the specific case of the German Energiewende. In the sense of a review, the central findings will be integrated into the spatial concept ‘production of space’ by Henri Lefebvre. This is intended to uncover those social spaces that are produced by the powerful actors of the Energiewende and that become unequal and unjust energy landscapes on the basis of neoliberal spatial concepts. In addition, it is necessary to discuss a conceptual question that has hardly been considered so far: whether and how can energy landscapes be distinguished from other landscapes and where exactly should the lines of demarcation be drawn in the context of debates on energy justice? It is shown that spatial demarcation based on the representative, symbolic, discursive, and thus material-abstract phenomena of landscape is an appropriate way to understand the population‘s resistance to the dominant territorial-institutional structures of the Energiewende. The study concludes that the achievement of climate goals appears realistic if the production of sustainable energy landscapes is primarily understood as the production of a discourse about sustainability, equity, and justice.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221462962030308X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101733; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85089350503&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S221462962030308X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101733
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know