Is community renewable energy always just? Examining energy injustices and inequalities in rural Indonesia
Energy Research & Social Science, ISSN: 2214-6296, Vol: 71, Page: 101825
2021
- 44Citations
- 265Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Community-based renewable electricity projects have been increasingly regarded as a promising means to alleviate rural energy poverty through ensuring just and inclusive outcomes. However, limited studies have been carried out to investigate the socio-political dynamics of such initiatives and the extent to which they overcome energy injustices in the Global South. Drawing on two case studies from Sumba Island in Eastern Indonesia, this article seeks to critically understand how micro-politics of planning and implementing community-based renewable projects influence their energy justice implications on the ground. In this study, we deploy a contextualised analysis of energy justice to demonstrate how particular socio-historical dimensions shape contemporary energy injustices in a postcolonial setting such as Sumba Island. We argue that the persistence of apolitical framing of community-based energy access intervention runs the risk of perpetuating exclusions and inequalities in rural energy provision. To address energy injustices, it is important to shift away from the centralised mentality that still prevails in the development of community-based renewables in Indonesia and beyond.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221462962030400X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101825; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85094104445&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S221462962030400X; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S221462962030400X?httpAccept=text/xml; https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S221462962030400X?httpAccept=text/plain; https://dul.usage.elsevier.com/doi/; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101825
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know