Overview of the factors affecting the performance of vanadium redox flow batteries
Journal of Energy Storage, ISSN: 2352-152X, Vol: 41, Page: 102857
2021
- 55Citations
- 126Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
Redox flow batteries are being utilised as an attractive electrochemical energy storage technology for electricity from renewable generation. At present, the global installed capacity of redox flow battery is 1100 MWh. There are several parameters that significantly govern redox flow battery performance amongst which electrode activation, electrode material, felt compression, electrolyte additive, electrolyte temperature, membrane, and flow field design are notable. This review article presents an overview of the influence of individual components by comparing the performance of a parametrically modified cell with a default cell, which has 0% felt compression, inactivated electrode, zero electrolyte additives, and ambient condition operation. From the reviewed studies, electrode activation (thermal, chemical, laser perforation) and felt compression were identified as the most significant parameters. Electrolyte additive and flow field design were identified to be reasonably significant. Electrolyte temperature and membrane type were identified as the least significant amongst all the parameters. Based on this survey, a parametric matrix has been outlined that will aid researchers to identify appropriate parameters to focus research efforts onto improved redox flow battery performance.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X21005806; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.102857; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85114120738&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352152X21005806; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.102857
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know