Analysis of three ice melting methods in supercooled water ice-making system
Journal of Energy Storage, ISSN: 2352-152X, Vol: 64, Page: 107255
2023
- 1Citations
- 6Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
New Findings on Energy Storage from Shanghai Maritime University Summarized (Analysis of Three Ice Melting Methods In Supercooled Water Ice-making System)
2023 AUG 04 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Energy Daily News -- Researchers detail new data in Energy - Energy Storage.
Article Description
In supercooled water ice-making system, ice jam threatens the stability of the system. In order to make the sub-cooler melt the ice on the pipe wall in time when the ice jam is about to happen, three methods of ice melting are put forward. The energy analysis, exergy analysis, economic analysis and carbon emission analysis were carried out for the three ice-melting methods. The results showed that the heat loss was zero, the energy utilization efficiency was the highest, and the carbon dioxide emission was the lowest when the ice-melting method of heat storage was used, running cost minimum, of each ice-melting only 0.103 yuan. The exergy loss of reverse method is 18.93 kJ/kg, but the reverse method has the highest melting temperature and the shortest melting time. The bypass method has a heat loss of 106.11 kJ/kg. The cost of melting ice and carbon dioxide emission is higher than the other two methods, but the initial investment is the lowest and the system is the most compact.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X23006527; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.107255; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85151284001&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352152X23006527; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.107255
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know