A GRASP method for building classification trees
Expert Systems with Applications, ISSN: 0957-4174, Vol: 39, Issue: 3, Page: 3241-3248
2012
- 13Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This paper proposes a new method for constructing binary classification trees. The aim is to build simple trees, i.e. trees which are as less complex as possible, thereby facilitating interpretation and favouring the balance between optimization and generalization in the test data sets. The proposed method is based on the metaheuristic strategy known as GRASP in conjunction with optimization tasks. Basically, this method modifies the criterion for selecting the attributes that determine the split in each node. In order to do so, a certain amount of randomisation is incorporated in a controlled way. We compare our method with the traditional method by means of a set of computational experiments. We conclude that the GRASP method (for small levels of randomness) significantly reduces tree complexity without decreasing classification accuracy.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417411013200; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.011; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80255137500&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0957417411013200; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.011
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know