A neutral cross-efficiency measurement for general parallel production system
Expert Systems with Applications, ISSN: 0957-4174, Vol: 205, Page: 117778
2022
- 12Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
There are some problems in the efficiency evaluation for parallel systems. From the applicability of existing models, the parallel models based on self-evaluation may produce the low distinguishing power and unreasonable input–output weights. From the accuracy of efficiency, the weights of partial production-units may be assigned zero values, and thereby the fail of the production-units will lead to the incomprehensibility of system efficiency. The neutral cross-efficiency model maximizes the evaluated decision-making unit (DMU) and simultaneously makes each output of the DMU being as efficient as possible, which effectively avoids the difficulty in choosing between aggressive and benevolent models, and reduces the number of zero output weights. Based on this, this paper proposes the neutral cross-efficiency evaluation method fo r general parallel systems. First, the self-evaluation models for parallel system and its production-units are developed, and the model can enable each production-unit to participate in the evaluation effectively. Then, the neutral cross-efficiency model is proposed to overcome the defects of self-evaluation model. Particularly, the proposed model is also suitable to special general parallel systems with shared resources. More importantly, the proposed models assign different input–output weights for the production-units to avoid the production-units being forced to run under identical production mechanism. Finally, two real-world examples prove the availability and effectiveness of the proposed method.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417422010508; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117778; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85132391365&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0957417422010508; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117778
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know