An online reviews-driven large-scale group decision making approach for evaluating user satisfaction of sharing accommodation
Expert Systems with Applications, ISSN: 0957-4174, Vol: 213, Page: 118875
2023
- 76Citations
- 74Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
To promote the development of the peer-to-peer (P2P) accommodation in sharing economy, it is important to understand and ensure the determinants of high-level user satisfaction. Focusing on factors that affect the travel experience of P2P accommodation users, this article proposes a large-scale group decision making (LSGDM) based method with online reviews to evaluate user satisfaction of sharing accommodation. Firstly, the user demands (UDs) reflecting the actual concerns of users are extracted by combining negative and positive reviews from P2P accommodation platform Airbnb, where negative reviews are classified by sentiment analysis, TF-IDF and Word2Vec technology are used for extraction and the further verification of UDs from all online reviews is performed. Secondly, the level of satisfaction is evaluated through online responses from P2P accommodation users in a large-scale group of decision makers. Thirdly, the final degrees of satisfaction are ascertained by the proposed LSGDM approach, which includes subgroup clustering and a minimal variance weights based feedback mechanism for fair weights allocation under the condition of reaching consensus. Finally, the conclusions further serve as references for improving the performance of P2P sharing accommodation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417422018930; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118875; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85144027227&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0957417422018930; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118875
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know