MACR: Multi-information Augmented Conversational Recommender
Expert Systems with Applications, ISSN: 0957-4174, Vol: 213, Page: 118981
2023
- 5Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Conversational recommender systems (CRS) aim to provide high-quality recommendations through fewer multi-turn conversations. However, because short conversation histories lack sufficient item information, CRSs not only struggle to make accurate recommendations but also lack diversity in the generated responses. Existing CRSs mainly alleviate these problems by introducing external information ( e.g., reviews) while ignoring information inside the conversations ( e.g., potential category preferences in user utterances). Besides, item introduction is a kind of external information that is more objective and contains more entities than reviews. Therefore, we propose a M ulti-information A ugmented C onversational R ecommender ( MACR ), which improves the performance of recommendation and response generation by mining the underlying category preferences in users’ utterances and incorporating item introductions. Specifically, we enhance the category associations among entities by constructing a knowledge graph DBMG with category nodes, extracting and encoding the item categories that match the user preferences into the user representation. For item introductions, we extract the entities in them and fuse them into the conversation using an introduction-attentive encoder–decoder. Extensive experiments on the dataset REDIAL show that our MACR significantly outperforms previous state-of-the-art approaches. The source code will be available at https://github.com/zcy-cqut/MACR.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417422019996; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118981; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85140297073&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0957417422019996; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118981
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know