On the environmental performance analysis: A combined fuzzy data envelopment analysis and artificial intelligence algorithms
Expert Systems with Applications, ISSN: 0957-4174, Vol: 224, Page: 119953
2023
- 32Citations
- 43Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Greenhouse gases (GHG) remain in the atmosphere for a very long-time causing alarmingly fast warming worldwide (global warming); especially Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions have become a worldwide concern because of their harmful effects on the climate, and they are considered as an undesirable product of a lot of production systems. Various models dealing with undesirable outputs for measuring environmental efficiency have been employed to control greenhouse gas emissions via forecasting and/or optimizing their emissions. In this regard, this study proposes a novel modified Fuzzy Undesirable Non-discretionary DEA (FUNDEA) model to Measure environmental efficiency, and combine it with some novel artificial intelligence algorithms (Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Gene Expression Programming (GEP) and Artificial Immune System (AIS)) in order to predict optimal values of inefficient Decision-Making Units (DMUs) for being more efficient and mitigating their Co 2 emissions in the uncertain environment for the first time herein. The model is applied to a dataset of 24 Iranian forest management units. Although our findings show that 17 DMUs are inefficient with a weak efficiency dispersion, these inefficient DMUs could improve their efficiency border by following the combined approaches (FUNDEA-ANN, FUNDEA-GEP and FUNDEA-AIS). As a consequence, the applied FUNDEA- artificial intelligent approaches are performed very well in predicting the optimal values of CO 2 emissions and, hence increasing the total environmental efficiency.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417423004554; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119953; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85151805227&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0957417423004554; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119953
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know