A novel Siamese deep hashing model for histopathology image retrieval
Expert Systems with Applications, ISSN: 0957-4174, Vol: 225, Page: 120169
2023
- 23Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Content-based histopathology image retrieval can be a useful technique for help in diagnosing various diseases. The process of retrieving images is often time-consuming and challenging due to the need for high-dimensional features when trying to model complex content. Hashing methods can therefore be employed to resolve the challenge by producing binary codes of different lengths. Deep hashing methods are frequently superior to traditional machine learning approaches but are affected by the size of training sets. In addition, back-propagation learning can further complicate the generation of binary values. Hence, this paper proposes a novel Siamese deep hashing model, named histopathology Siamese deep hashing (HSDH), for histopathology image retrieval. Two designed deep hashing models with shared weights and structures are used to generate hash codes. A Hamming distance layer is then applied to evaluate the similarity of the generated values. A highly effective loss function is also introduced that incorporates a modified version of the standard contrastive loss function with an error estimation term to improve both the training and retrieval phases. In the retrieval phase, the trained model compares a query image with all the training images and ranks the most similar images. According to the experimental results on two publicly available databases, BreakHis and Kather, the HSDH model outperforms other state-of-the-art hashing-based methods in histopathology image retrieval.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417423006711; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120169; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85153495501&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0957417423006711; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120169
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know