EARR: Using rules to enhance the embedding of knowledge graph
Expert Systems with Applications, ISSN: 0957-4174, Vol: 232, Page: 120831
2023
- 6Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Knowledge graphs have been receiving increasing attention from researchers. However, most of these graphs are incomplete, leading to the rise of knowledge graph completion as a prominent task. The goal of knowledge graph completion is to find missing relations in a knowledge graph. Knowledge graph embedding represents the entities and relations in a low-dimensional embedding space, simplifying operations and allowing for integration with knowledge graph completion tasks. Several popular embedding models, such as TransE, TransH, TransR, TuckER, RotatE, and others have achieved impressive results on knowledge graph completion tasks. However, most of these methods do not incorporate background knowledge that could enhance the quality of knowledge embedding. Logic rules are adaptable and scalable, which can enrich background knowledge, and separating the attributes of entities can improve the relevance of relations and facilitate the accuracy of logic rule extraction. Thus, we propose a novel method, named Entity–Attribute–Relation–Rule (EARR), which separates attributes from entities and uses logic rules to extend the dataset, improving the accuracy of knowledge graph completion tasks. We define a total of six rules in this paper, including Rule 1–3, Rule 5, and Rule 6 for entities, and Rule 4 for entities and attributes. We evaluate our method based on the task of link prediction through two kinds of experiments. In the basic experiment, we compare our method with three benchmark models, namely, TransE, TransH, and TransR. In the experiment with different size datasets, FB24K and CoDEx, we evaluate our method on different size datasets with different models, including TransE, TuckER, and RotatE. The experimental results indicate that EARR can improve the quality of knowledge graph embedding.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417423013337; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120831; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85163846569&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0957417423013337; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120831
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know