A robust ranking method for online rating systems with spammers by interval division
Expert Systems with Applications, ISSN: 0957-4174, Vol: 235, Page: 121236
2024
- 2Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
It is crucial to identify spammers from online e-commerce platform to maintain the order of fairness. Existing methods have limitations to detect spammers if the underlying network is extreme sparse. In this paper, a novel method has been proposed to address this challenge from two folds. It is inspired by the idea that a trust-worthy rater will always give a reasonable rating which has been statistically significant and locates in an interval following normal distribution. To deal with low-degree spammers with limited information, rating patterns with preference are involved as well. Such two parts lead to an Interval Division-based Ranking (IDR) method. Experimental study on challenging sparse network Amazon demonstrates that the performance gain of recall is at least 15.4%. Top 50 movies selected by IDR from Douban have a high mean value 9.552 and a low variance 0.036.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417423017384; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121236; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85168807853&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0957417423017384; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121236
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know