Few-shot ICD coding with knowledge transfer and evidence representation
Expert Systems with Applications, ISSN: 0957-4174, Vol: 238, Page: 121861
2024
- 2Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The task of automatic ICD (International Classification of Diseases) coding involves allocating appropriate ICD codes to electronic health records. Due to the long-tailed distribution of ICD codes, current methods perform poorly on rare diseases, also known as few-shot codes. Consequently, we resort to transfer learning as a solution to address the challenge of ICD coding with limited instances. In our paper, we examine the opportunities in few-shot ICD coding and propose a new solution, the evidence-representation-based meta-network (EPEN). Our model has two key innovations: (i) we design evidence representation for diseases based on the observation that the same disease can have different symptoms among individuals, and (ii) we construct a meta-network to memorize category knowledge from common diseases and apply it to rare diseases. Many experiments show that our EPEN solution performs better than the previous methods for both frequently occurring ICD codes and infrequently occurring ICD codes (few-shot codes). Furthermore, EPEN exhibits improved stability in performance, as evidenced by an improvement in both the mean and range of the F1-score.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417423023631; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121861; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85174181896&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0957417423023631; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121861
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know