Quantitative Assessment of Human T Lymphocytes in RAG2 −/− γc −/− Mice: The Impact of Ex Vivo Manipulation on In Vivo Functionality
Experimental Hematology, ISSN: 0301-472X, Vol: 35, Issue: 1, Page: 117-127
2007
- 12Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- 12
- CrossRef9
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
Article Description
Recent clinical trials of adoptive immunotherapy showed diminished reactivity of human T cells upon ex vivo manipulation. For a safe and effective clinical application of human T cells, it is necessary to improve ex vivo manipulation procedures and evaluate their impact on in vivo functionality. However, there is no preclinical model for quantitative assessment of in vivo functionality of human T cells. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of using the huPBMC- RAG2 −/− γc −/− xenogeneic mouse model. As a first example, we compared 3 different ex vivo culture conditions for human T cells. RAG2 −/− γc −/− mice received cultured human T cells that were stimulated via CD3 alone or costimulated via CD28 (CD3/28) and/or human 4-1BB (CD3/28/4-1BB). Engraftment levels and survival of the cells were measured. The dynamics of the human T cell phenotypes were analyzed during culture and in vivo, as well as the mechanism of the xenoresponse. Engraftment potential was improved twofold for costimulation compared to CD3 alone ( p < 0.001). Phenotypic analysis showed a strikingly similar pattern of development towards CD4 + and CD8 + effector and effector-memory cells, suggesting antigen-driven survival and expansion. All parameters used to analyze different effects on in vivo T-cell functionality, like culture condition, engraftment levels, survival of the cells over time, or xenogeneic graft-vs-host disease were absolutely independent of the distribution of the T cell population in vivo following contact with xeno-antigen. The huPBMC-RAG2 −/− γc −/− xenogeneic transplant model is the most sensitive to date for in vivo functional evaluation of human T cells.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301472X06006400; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exphem.2006.09.018; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33845788763&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17198880; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301472X06006400; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exphem.2006.09.018
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know