Mutagenicity and genotoxicity assessment of a new biopreservative product rich in Enterocin AS-48
Food and Chemical Toxicology, ISSN: 0278-6915, Vol: 146, Page: 111846
2020
- 9Citations
- 21Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef9
- Captures21
- Readers21
- 21
Article Description
A biopreservative derived from the fermentation of a dairy byproduct by Enterococcus faecalis UGRA10 strains being developed. This product possesses a strong and wide antibacterial spectrum mainly due to the presence of Enterocin AS-48 in its composition. To assess its potential as food additive, the mutagenicicity and genotoxicity has been assayed by means of the bacterial reverse-mutation assay in Salmonella typhimurium TA97A, TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535 strains (Ames test, OECD 471, 2020) and the micronucleus test (MN) (OECD 487, 2016) in L5178Y/Tk ± cells. The results in the Ames test after exposure to the byproduct (6.75–100 μg/plate) with absence and presence of the metabolic activation system from rat liver (S9 fraction), revealed not mutagenicity at the conditions tested. For the MN test, the exposition to five enterocin AS-48 concentrations (0.2–1 μg/μl) was tested in the absence and presence of S9 fraction, with no evidence of genotoxicity. Negative results in the mutagenicity and genotoxicity assays point out the good safety profile of the byproduct and support its use as additive. Further toxicological studies are required before its approval and commercial application.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691520307365; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2020.111846; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85095776001&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33166674; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0278691520307365; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2020.111846
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know