Cryopreserved embryo transfer is an independent risk factor for placenta accreta
Fertility and Sterility, ISSN: 0015-0282, Vol: 103, Issue: 5, Page: 1176-1184.e2
2015
- 147Citations
- 122Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations147
- Citation Indexes142
- 142
- CrossRef95
- Policy Citations4
- Policy Citation4
- Clinical Citations1
- PubMed Guidelines1
- Captures122
- Readers122
- 122
Article Description
To explore the association between cryopreserved embryo transfer (CET) and risk of placenta accreta among patients utilizing in vitro fertilization (IVF) and/or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Case-control study. Academic medical center. All patients using IVF and/or ICSI, with autologous or donor oocytes, undergoing fresh or cryopreserved transfer, who delivered a live-born fetus at ≥24 weeks of gestation at our center, from 2005 to 2011 (n = 1,571), were reviewed for placenta accreta at delivery. Cases of accreta (n = 50) were matched by age and prior cesarean section to controls (1:3) without accreta. The association between CET and accreta was modeled using conditional logistic regression, controlling a priori for age and placenta previa. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine thresholds of endometrial thickness and peak serum E 2 levels related to accreta. Placenta accreta. Univariate predictors of accreta were non-Caucasian race (odds ratio [OR] 2.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25–6.47); uterine factor infertility (OR 5.80, 95% CI 2.49–13.50); prior abdominal or laparoscopic myomectomy (OR 7.24, 95% CI 1.92–27.28); and persistent or resolved placenta previa (OR 4.25, 95% CI 1.94–9.33). In multivariate analysis, we observed a significant association between CET and accreta (adjusted OR 3.20, 95% CI 1.14–9.02), which remained when analyses were restricted to cases of accreta with morbid complications (adjusted OR 3.87, 95% CI 1.08–13.81). Endometrial thickness and peak serum E 2 level were each significantly lower in CET cycles and those with accreta. Cryopreserved ET is a strong independent risk factor for accreta among patients using IVF and/or ICSI. A threshold endometrial thickness and a “safety window” of optimal peak E 2 level are proposed for external validation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028215000680; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.01.021; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84929514089&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25747133; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0015028215000680; http://www.fertstert.org/article/S0015-0282(15)00068-0/abstract
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know