Single-port endoscope-assisted resection of forehead osteoma
Formosan Journal of Surgery, ISSN: 1682-606X, Vol: 48, Issue: 2, Page: 57-61
2015
- 8Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Endoscope-assisted resection of forehead osteoma is a well-established procedure with the advantages of improved safety, accessibility, and visualization of the mass, avoidance of visible scarring or pigmentation on the forehead, and reduced risk of bleeding, hematoma formation, nerve injury, or paresthesia. The potential drawbacks are alopecia on the scalp incision sites and injury of the deep supraorbital nerve branch.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1682606X15000481; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fjs.2015.04.001; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84931563255&origin=inward; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1682606X15000481; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fjs.2015.04.001
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know