Response of ground beetle (Carabidae) assemblages to logging history in northern hardwood–hemlock forests
Forest Ecology and Management, ISSN: 0378-1127, Vol: 222, Issue: 1, Page: 335-347
2006
- 62Citations
- 138Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We quantified differences in ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) communities in relation to forest management practices and historic forest cover changes in hardwood–hemlock forests of the north central United States. Beetles were sampled with pitfall traps in 1996 and 1997 and compared among three forest types: old-growth, and post-logging uneven- and even-aged forests. Non-metric multidimensional scaling ordination was used to assess compositional differences among forest types for 39 carabid species (43,483 individuals), which revealed distinct differences in beetle assemblages among forest types. Coarse woody debris, snag volume, gap area, understory vegetation and forest floor depth were significantly correlated with ordination axes suggesting that these variables are critical in structuring the beetle communities. Several of the species significantly associated with old-growth forests, like Carabus sylvosus, are known to favor forest habitats, whereas species commonly found in open habitats, such as Carabus nemoralis, had stronger affiliations with managed forests. Comparisons of northern hardwood–hemlock forest distribution from pre-Euroamerican settlement with current distributions reconstructed using the Forest Inventory and Analysis database indicate that old-growth habitat has declined to <1% of its original extent in this region. At the landscape level, these data suggest that the abundance of carabid species that prefer old-growth forest conditions has undergone broad-scale decline.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112705006328; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.028; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=31444434486&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378112705006328; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.028
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know