Congruence of the spatial pattern of light and understory vegetation in an old-growth, temperate mixed forest
Forest Ecology and Management, ISSN: 0378-1127, Vol: 381, Page: 84-92
2016
- 60Citations
- 86Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Light is one of the most important drivers of understory vegetation in forests, influencing the patterns of total cover as well as the abundance of individual species. Based on a multi-scale approach, the relationships between the amount and pattern of relative diffuse light and forest understory were studied in an old-growth, temperate mixed forest (Hungary). The recorded vegetation variables were the cover of the vascular understory (herbs, woody seedlings), the bryophyte layer, and some selected vascular understory species. The pattern of light showed aggregations at two scales: 10 × 10 and 25 × 25 m. Both vascular understory and bryophyte cover had significant positive correlations with light availability, and their spatial pattern was related to it. The pattern of seedlings displayed the strongest relationships with that of light at a coarser scale (25 × 25 m) than herbs and bryophytes (10 × 10 m). At the species level, Festuca heterophylla, Fragaria vesca and Poa nemoralis were characterized as light-demanding herbaceous species (their spatial pattern was congruent with light), Brachypodium sylvaticum and Carex pallescens were transitional, while some species proved to be shade-tolerant (e.g. Ajuga reptans, Dryopteris carthusiana, Viola reichenbachiana ). Regarding seedlings, the patterns of Betula pendula, Carpinus betulus, Pinus sylvestris and Quercus petraea were related to the pattern of light. According to our observations, diversity and composition of vascular forest understory and bryophytes were related to heterogeneous light conditions. Forest management should maintain continuous shelter on the stand level; however, smaller gaps are necessary for the survival of light-demanding forest herbs and bryophytes, and larger gaps for tree seedlings.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112716305990; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.09.027; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84988642983&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378112716305990; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.09.027
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know