Estimating the self-thinning line from mortality data
Forest Ecology and Management, ISSN: 0378-1127, Vol: 402, Page: 122-134
2017
- 25Citations
- 67Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent Blog
Qaeco’s favourite papers of 2017
We asked our lab members to nominate a paper published in 2017 that they had enjoyed. Recommendations ranged from the skill-based (scientific writing, reproducible coding, camera-trapping) to global reviews (plant traits, climate change, size-based models) and some great case studies (questionable psychologists, waterbirds at Lake Eyre, Finnish foxes). We hope you find them as interesting as we d
Article Description
Self-thinning is fundamental to modern density-based forest management. The process of self-thinning arises from the dynamic interaction of stand growth and mortality at equilibrium conditions. However, despite the dynamic basis for the self-thinning process, it is typically modeled using static size-density data. We tested the ability of a simple stand mortality model to estimate the self-thinning line. We used data from long-term silvicultural experiments for six common Eucalyptus species in southeastern Australia. Our approach built on existing mortality model structure that predicts survival trajectories that follow a self-thinning line. We used Poisson and negative binomial generalized linear models for count data as well as a non-linear least squares procedure on the integrated scale to calibrate the mortality model. Derived self-thinning parameters were compared to parameters calibrated on the static allometry between quadratic mean diameter ( Dq ) and stand density ( N ) using two reference methods (linear model and stochastic frontier analysis). Our dynamic mortality models provided estimates of the self-thinning line that were as good as or better than those obtained using reference methods; however, this required accounting for overdispersion of mortality count data. We validated survival trajectories using independent data for the three most abundant eucalypt species and found that they showed excellent behavior. Survival trajectories predicted by the mortality models were consistent with, and accurately estimated, the self-thinning line for the eucalypt species in our study. The simplicity of calibrating mortality models using GLM methods raises the possibility of quantifying how environmental drivers influence the dynamic self-thinning equilibrium.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112717308320; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.07.027; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85026547346&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378112717308320; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.07.027
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know