The significance of large old trees and tree cavities for forest carbon estimates
Forest Ecology and Management, ISSN: 0378-1127, Vol: 546, Page: 121319
2023
- 9Citations
- 12Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
CP Daily: Thursday September 14, 2023
Presenting CP Daily, Carbon Pulse’s free newsletter. It’s a daily summary of our news plus bite-sized updates from around the world. Subscribe here TOP STORY The
Article Description
Large old trees have declined worldwide, even though they play a prominent role in biodiversity and also in carbon stocks of forests. We were interested in the contribution of large old trees to aboveground stand biomass and the role of wood decay inside the trunk and tree cavities for biomass and thus organic carbon stocks. We investigated this question using the example of old-growth oak forests, since oak is the tree species with the highest proportion of large old trees in Germany. Although we studied oak stands with a strongly above-average proportion of large old trees (with an aboveground biomass of 563 Mg ha −1 ), internal stem decay and tree cavities resulted in only about 1% overestimation of stand biomass. This was determined by subtracting biomass losses from internal stem decay from conventional biomass estimates derived from allometric regression. The extent of internal stem decay was measured using sonic tomography. Internal stem decay is thus negligible for stock density, but should be considered for continent-wide or global analyses where even small percentages add to large absolute errors. If trees of a stem diameter ≥ 7 cm were included in the analysis, the 11% largest trees of the stands accounted for 50% of the aboveground biomass. This result differs from recently published values of a global analysis suggesting that the 1% largest trees represent 50% of the stand biomass, but this difference is influenced by the minimum diameter at which young trees are included in the analysis. We suggest excluding young growth with diameters so small that their biomass does not significantly affect stand biomass from such analyses.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112723005534; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121319; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85169831092&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378112723005534; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121319
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know