Threats to the persistence of sugar pine ( Pinus lambertiana ) in the western USA
Forest Ecology and Management, ISSN: 0378-1127, Vol: 554, Page: 121659
2024
- 14Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures14
- Readers14
- 14
Article Description
This study assesses how numerous stressors shape the vital rates (survival, growth, and fecundity) of sugar pine across the vast majority of its range. Sugar pine ( Pinus lambertiana Dougl. ) is the largest Pinus species, an important timber species, and a component of several dry conifer forest types of western North America, in particular the extensive Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forest. The species faces several challenges in the Anthropocene, including a disrupted fire regime, an invasive pathogen, forest structure changes, and drought with ensuing bark beetle epidemics. Managers are concerned about the conservation outlook for sugar pine, but it is unclear where and how to best invest conservation resources. Using data from the US Forest Service’s Forest Inventory and Analysis program, we estimate the parameters for the vital rate functions and use these to construct an integral projection model which predicts the effects of various stressors on the asymptotic population growth rate. The asymptotic population growth rate is near or slightly below one even under reference conditions, and the actual abundance (in terms of both stem density and basal area) slightly declined over the duration of the study (2001–2019). The analysis reveals that wildfire, white pine blister rust, and forest density are key drivers of the demographic rates of sugar pine across its range. Drought and site dryness had lesser, but still meaningful, effects. Fire has strong negative effects on survival, resulting in a strongly negative population trajectory on burned sites. Conversely, lower than average forest density (plot-level basal area) results in a positive population growth rate via beneficial effects on individual growth. These results highlight the value of fire hazard mitigation, particularly where it also reduces forest density, in the conservation of this important species.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112723008939; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121659; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85182874283&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378112723008939; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121659
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know