Legacy of traditional forest management: The impact of historical charcoal burning on soil biodiversity after centuries
Forest Ecology and Management, ISSN: 0378-1127, Vol: 572, Page: 122299
2024
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures5
- Readers5
Article Description
European forests have been influenced by human interventions for millennia. Many formerly traditional forest management practices have been lost due to changes in technology and attitudes. One commonly used practice was charcoal burning, remnants of which have remained in the forests for hundreds of years. We aimed to evaluate the differences between abandoned remnants of charcoal mounds and their surroundings in terms of soil-dwelling fauna and to compare them with old-growth forests in reserves of the Czech Republic. Our primary focus was on four macroarthropod taxa: centipedes, millipedes, terrestrial woodlice and symphylans. We discovered that charcoal mounds did not significantly differ from control forest patches regarding species richness and rigidity but varied in species composition and functional traits. In comparison, forest reserves were significantly richer in species, hosted less adaptable taxa, higher functional traits and exhibited different species compositions with the same number of shared species with charcoal mounds and controls. We found that the addition of charcoal residuals from traditional forest management can enrich pedobiodiversity – old, abandoned charcoal mounds within forests can enhance the biodiversity of relatively species-poor soils. Nevertheless, these residuals cannot match the biodiversity found in undisturbed old-growth forests. However, stand-scale biochar application in plantation forests could be a promising biodiversity strategy that mimics this traditional forest management practice.
Bibliographic Details
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know