Controlling shareholders’ stock pledges and greenwashing–Evidence from China
Finance Research Letters, ISSN: 1544-6123, Vol: 69, Page: 106227
2024
- 13Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures13
- Readers13
- 13
Article Description
This study examines whether controlling shareholders’ stock pledges may affect greenwashing. Controlling shareholders’ stock pledges can increase the commitment of controlling shareholders and reduce their risk-taking willingness. Both the existence and the percentage of controlling shareholders’ stock pledges are negatively related to greenwashing. The findings are robust to the 2SLS estimation with IV, PSM, entropy balancing, and other tests. Moreover, the effect is stronger for long-term stock pledges, suggesting that the longer duration of stock pledges may serve as a stronger motivation for controlling shareholders to restrain misconduct, which provides important insights on how to address greenwashing amid growing environmental concerns.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S154461232401256X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106227; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85205433668&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S154461232401256X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106227
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know