Validation of ITS barcode for the identification of CITES Malagasy Dalbergia (Fabaceae) species
Forensic Science International: Animals and Environments, ISSN: 2666-9374, Vol: 5, Page: 100089
2024
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
The precious Malagasy rosewood species of the genus Dalbergia have been listed in Appendix II of CITES due to illegal logging and timber trade. Accurate identification and proper delimitation are of paramount importance for endangered species regulated by CITES. One of the most accurate methods of identifying precious woods is DNA barcoding which is a technique for rapid and accurate species identification based on a short DNA sequence or a few DNA regions. Recent studies have shown that the ITS barcode can identify Malagasy Dalbergia species, but the number of species has been limited. In this research study, a total of 136 nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (nr ITS ) DNA sequences representing 41 species of Malagasy Dalbergia were used to assess the effectiveness of the ITS barcode in species identification. Each sequence was evaluated by genetic distance and tree-based methods. Using clustering analyses, estimating genetic distances, and comparing sequences of 136 samples, we were able to distinguish species. The interspecific distance was greater than the intraspecific distance, but no barcoding gap was observed. It was found that ITS has a very high discriminatory power for Malagasy Dalbergia species using both NJ and TaxonDNA methods. Considering the "Best Match" and "Best Close Match" analyses, the discrimination powers of ITS were 98.54% and 93.40%, respectively. Our research indicates that the use of ITS as a barcode enables the identification of Malagasy Dalbergia species and contributes to completing the reference library for controlling the trade in precious woods. These results are essential to ensure effective enforcement of regulations and promote the long-term conservation of these species.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266693742400009X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsiae.2024.100089; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85195055904&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S266693742400009X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsiae.2024.100089
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know