Familias 3 – Extensions and new functionality
Forensic Science International: Genetics, ISSN: 1872-4973, Vol: 13, Page: 121-127
2014
- 172Citations
- 118Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations172
- Citation Indexes163
- 163
- CrossRef113
- Policy Citations9
- 9
- Captures118
- Readers118
- 118
Article Description
In relationship testing the aim is to determine the most probable pedigree structure given genetic marker data for a set of persons. Disaster Victim Identification (DVI) based on DNA data from presumed relatives of the missing persons can be considered to be a collection of relationship problems. Forensic calculations in investigative mode address questions like “How many markers and reference persons are needed?” Such questions can be answered by simulations. Mutations, deviations from Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium (or more generally, accounting for population substructure) and silent alleles cannot be ignored when evaluating forensic evidence in case work. With the advent of new markers, so called microvariants have become more common. Previous mutation models are no longer appropriate and a new model is proposed. This paper describes methods designed to deal with DVI problems and a new simulation model to study distribution of likelihoods. There are softwares available, addressing similar problems. However, for some problems including DVI, we are not aware of freely available validated software. The Familias software has long been widely used by forensic laboratories worldwide to compute likelihoods in relationship scenarios, though previous versions have lacked desired functionality, such as the above mentioned. The extensions as well as some other novel features have been implemented in the new version, freely available at www.familias.no. The implementation and validation are briefly mentioned leaving complete details to Supplementary sections.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872497314001409; http://www.familias.no/; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.07.004; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84907334835&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25113576; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1872497314001409; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.07.004
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know