Active suppression of swirl-stabilized combustion instability
Fuel, ISSN: 0016-2361, Vol: 287, Page: 119559
2021
- 19Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In this paper, active suppression methods are studied to reduce combustion instability. In particular, a controller is used to output a control signal to a sampled oscillating pressure wave. A control acoustic wave is released from an actuator in opposite phase to the oscillating pressure wave. The two waves superimpose and reduce the oscillating intensity of combustion instability. The experiments suggest that the oscillating pressure presents mutagenicity in combustion instability conditions: the frequency, amplitude, and phase will change suddenly. Moreover, the flame pulsation will also follow the control acoustic wave. Therefore, the output control phase should have a higher refresh frequency. As the novelty of this paper, two methods of phase following/recognition based on FPGA are proposed to suppress oscillating pressure: Sinusoidal approximation and waveform delay, respectively. The former is responsible for identifying the initial phase of the oscillating pressure according to the sampling data every 25 ms, whereas the latter is responsible for suppressing future oscillating pressure by the waveform acquired in the previous period. The results suggest that the amplitude of the oscillating pressure can be reduced by more than 50% under different working conditions. Moreover, proper orthogonal decomposition and dynamic mode decomposition are used to study the suppression effects on the intensity of flame pulsation. The ability of active control in suppressing flame fluctuations is relatively limited.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016236120325552; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119559; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85094952792&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0016236120325552; https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119559
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know